Ok, I've uploaded the image again here so everyone can see the difference.
This is my Picture. Clear, sharp, brilliant colors.

Sorry guys, that you may have can not make a comparison we deleted it. I loaded it is now high on my personal page.
Please see previous comments (page 3) There is the new link and again the old to compare!

http://abstract.desktopnexus.com/get/175791

And now look at comparative times as blurred, faded, this looks like another.
http://abstract.desktopnexus.com/get/150728[/URL]


Here we see clearly the difference. It has cut off his head.
[URL=http://abstract.desktopnexus.com/wallpaper/175825/]http://abstract.des
ktopnexus.com/wallpaper/175825/
Here Original:
http://abstract.desktopnexus.com/wallpaper/38388/

Here we see clearly the difference. One can clearl see how countries no longer have their original shape.
http://abstract.desktopnexus.com/wallpaper/175826/

Here Original:
http://abstract.desktopnexus.com/wallpaper/27592/

A friend told me also that this picture may remain, however. This policy I find quite strange.

Original:
http://architecture.desktopnexus.com/wallpaper/33280/

Duplicate:
http://nature.desktopnexus.com/wallpaper/172877/

[B]So I go get the 100 most successful pictures of here, would reduce or increase the color and it stays here?? That can not be true??

Hello Komodo, there is no dispute that your extension program bad. I Personally, find it very very well, but unfortunately it is not perfect.

And now tell me there is not a difference in quality.[/B][I]

Oh, explicit content! 175791 is better. *o*


Actually I believe the First-Came-First-Served basis is better, unless it was quite some great effort to get the WP with a higher resolution. So, some sort of reward could be appropriate. By letting the one with the better resolution to have the upload.

In any case. I do agree that the artists themselves should always have the right to upload.


See, that's way so many people worship Windows XP! Because it can even do a simply resize.

after looking at the links and seeing the comparison of both images on the three examples then i think the moderators could work together with the uploaders of the pictures (thats all of the dupe,s) and discuss leaving up the better quality and sized images so it would make for a better solution than having blurred out images in the first instance you have given. if i was to report a wallpaper it would be the blurred out image so the better quality could stay.
i know which i,d pick out the two.?
fine examples and good post.
chat soooooooooooon

Posted by onuphrius on 09/12/09 at 10:38 AMThank you, a little cheering up. I also say I am happy to provide a picture of me erased if one has a better quality. Thanks
--------------------------------------------------------
when you look at what people are saying about it some of them have got onto the resolution side of the argument but given you can download it in any size it only makes sense to have the better quality up,.still think that moderators and admin could work with the person who uploaded the other and say lets work together and get the new upload of a better quality work up there than the one thats up and credit both or something like that.especially in the age of HD tv,s and how you can plug your computers into your tv i know which i would prefer thats the better quality becuase of reasons like this.? and for arguments sake my tv is a 42 inch so you can massivly see the difference when viewed at that size and even on my 19inch monitor its very significant.which when i download thru that its 1440 X 900 so still like the better quality.and for another reason i,ve had some of mine deleted for the blurredness even tho i thought they was ok and even asked admin why it was deleted and i had a chance to upload that wallpaper again because for what ever am not 100% sure neither was admin for that case.? without going back and looking thru my e-mails i can,t give you the full reason?.
so some people must of reported that wallpaper because they were not happy so rather than upload it again i left it,.
anyway back to the subject in hand better quality means more people would come along and download the better quality if you put side by side 2 picture,s one inferior in quality and in my opinion the waste of upload would be the inferior quality if go to shops to buy a tv and money was no object you would choose the better of what was on offer.so thats my opinion.
and keep on fighting maybe something could be done...fingers crossed.
chat ya soon,.

I agree with Onuphrius. I am also of good quality.
I prefer to delete it (my picture should have a poorer quality in favor) to better!

Yes, I think it also not good. So let us all get the top 100 to change the color a bit and load it as new.

This is indeed important to keep the high quality images so that people with bigger screens would also be able to enjoy the beauty of DN wallpapers. Therefore, administration should allow the removal of a previously uploaded image if later a DN member uploads the same picture with a higher resolution.

Image stats can be dealt with as follows (just an example): the stats of the old image can be combined with stats of the new one, so that both uploaders will get credit from it. A time restraint can also be applied to this: if the new image of higher resolution is uploaded within, say a month from the date when the old image was uploaded, then the old picture's stats are deleted and not combined with the new image's stats. This is to preserve the stats of much older pictures and keeps their owners happy.

MrUnknown

Here are some examples:
ORIGINAL:
http://videogames.desktopnexus.com/wallpaper/175632/
Upload in 1920 X 1200
http://abstract.desktopnexus.com/wallpaper/176131/
At the bottom of the screen lacks a little picture.

ORIGINAL:
http://abstract.desktopnexus.com/wallpaper/28393/
Upload in 1920 X 1200
http://abstract.desktopnexus.com/wallpaper/176133/
At the lower and upper edge of the picture is missing a little picture. Watch for the frame.


ORIGINAL:
http://abstract.desktopnexus.com/wallpaper/30114/
Upload in 1920 X 1200
http://abstract.desktopnexus.com/wallpaper/176132/
At the bottom of the screen missing snow and tires.

good point vanyel i make or modify my own wallpapers and try and keep them has crisp has possible and to the best of my abilitys.
now maybe people out there who have uploaded a wallpaper with what ever size(which is irrelevent to me) and then someone comes along with a much better picture quality then admin and the uploaders of that said wallpaper,s could work together to keep the crisp quality credit both uploaders in some way and then all would be fine.
but if some one uploads a rubbish quality and the better quality is already uploaded then obviously that and should be considered a duplicate.? (just a simple delete)
but in role reversal i see only the best way is to work together with all concerned over the wallpapers in question and keep the best representation and ditch the poor but credit all in some way.
but like some of the examplas shown here in the post they are just cropped down versions of uploaded wallpapers so i consider these has duplicates.
but if you upload something slightly different then where is the line drawn.?
chat ya all soon,. byeeeeeee 4 now